How Covert Filming Revealed a Multi-Million Pound Timeshare Scam
Prosecutors have labeled it as one of the largest scams of its type in the United Kingdom.
In all 14 individuals have been found guilty for their role in a £28m plot to cheat more than 3,500 holiday ownership holders.
The victims were eager to exit long-standing holiday ownership agreements and sought out support.
The majority were from 60 and 80. Over 500 of them surrendered in excess of £10,000, and a single victim paid more than £80,000.
Those affected were exposed to high-pressure sales meetings lasting up to six hours. They were financially worse off, possessing valueless fake "rewards" and remained bound by expensive timeshare contracts they could no longer use.
The Firm At the Heart of the Fraud
The company at the heart of the scheme was the timeshare resale company. They took customers' funds to finance the proprietors' lavish lifestyle of exclusive education, high-end properties and personal aircraft.
The leader at the top of the organization, Mark Rowe, was sentenced to a seven-and-half year sentence in January for fraudulent conspiracy.
Recently, his wife Nicola was part of the concluding cases to learn their fate.
She was given a 24-month suspended prison term at the London court after pleading guilty to money laundering.
This has been a long time coming and represents a major victory for the individuals who testified, the authorities and the Crown.
How the Probe Started
I first heard about the company came in the summer of 2016. I was working in the investigations unit of a media outlet, making documentary shows.
A friend pointed out that his mother had taken over the rights of a timeshare apartment in the Spanish coast and, after years of holidays, had begun looking to exit the contract.
It's worth mentioning how common timeshares had evolved with UK travelers in the eighties and nineties.
Vacation properties enabled families to use the equivalent unit every year, or swap their vacation periods with fellow investors who had apartments in other resorts. About 600,000 vacation seekers took up that chance.
The early surge was linked to a numerous accounts about unscrupulous sellers deceptively promoting units. They appeared frequently on public interest shows.
The common vacation property deal tied investors in for decades.
At that time, those investors who had experienced their regular accommodation in the sunshine for decades were getting older, and a large proportion were attempting to say farewell to their holiday properties.
Several had reduced ability to travel and found it difficult to access their properties. Some just believed they'd achieved their goals from them. And others had deceased, in many cases leaving their family members to take over the agreements - plus their annual payments and service charges.
The Covert Probe Progresses
And that's where the relative had been placed. She searched the web for solutions and found SMT, a enterprise whose website claimed to get her out of her contract.
But, having submitted funds and scheduled a consultation with them, her family smelled a rat.
Further research uncovered numerous individuals reporting they had handed over cash and got nothing out of it. In fact, they had lost money. A lot of it.
The reporting group started looking into what was happening. It quickly became clear that there were dubious individuals working within the vacation property industry.
One lawyer had many grievance cases preparing to take action against the organization.
We spoke to individuals who had used the firm and they all told the same story. They assumed the company would purchase their timeshare from them but when they participated in a session (for which they made an advance payment) they were informed there was no potential buyers.
In place of that, they were pushed - indeed pressured - to invest additional funds acquiring "Monster Rewards", linked to the outfit's parent company, Monster Travel.
What exactly these were was somewhat vague. They appeared to be a form of credit, providing discount travel and amenities and shopping deals.
And they were reportedly "transferable with other owners, some time down the line.
Paying cash up front now would produce an future return that would offset the firm's costs and leave the investor with a gain, released finally from their burdensome agreement.
Too good to be true? Certainly, that proved correct.
A 'Deceptive Tactic'
Based on these descriptions were accurate, this was a massive scam.
The technique is termed a "deceptive marketing."
A business - here the organization - "attracts the client by advertising a specific service and then state it cannot be provided, directing the individual towards another, inferior option.
Such practices are unlawful. Armed with all the accounts we had collected, we made the case to covertly record one of the organization's sessions.
The process requires dedication, work, and compelling reasons for why this is the only way to obtain the data needed to demonstrate illegal activity.
Armed with that permission, our limited crew set up a meeting with one of the organization's staff in the location.
Posing as a potential client aiming to help his mother released from her timeshare contract|holiday ownership agreement